Comments on: JavaScript::Lint http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2006/06/02/javascript-lint/ Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:00:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dominic Mitchell http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2006/06/02/javascript-lint/comment-page-1/#comment-685 Dominic Mitchell Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:36:42 +0000 tag:happygiraffe.net:Article299#comment-685 <p>Ahhh! I’d completely forgotten about your JavaScript Lint. My apologies. Given that it’s only been a day or two since release, I’ll rename the module as you suggest. Thanks for the heads up!</p> Ahhh! I’d completely forgotten about your JavaScript Lint. My apologies. Given that it’s only been a day or two since release, I’ll rename the module as you suggest. Thanks for the heads up!

]]> By: Matthias Miller http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2006/06/02/javascript-lint/comment-page-1/#comment-684 Matthias Miller Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:19:00 +0000 tag:happygiraffe.net:Article299#comment-684 <p>When I named my own <a href="http://www.javascriptlint.com/" rel="nofollow">JavaScript Lint</a> (<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/javascriptlint" rel="nofollow">SourceForge</a>), I should have known I was asking for trouble. So far, Douglas Crockford and I have managed to keep from stepping on each other’s toes by exclusively calling his lint JSLint and calling mine JavaScript Lint or jsl.</p> <p>It would probably be nice branding to have the Perl packaged called JavaScript::JSLint to advertise the lint’s engine. It would also prevent some of the existing confusion from becoming worse. :-)</p> <p>Good work, though. That’s pretty slick.</p> <p>-Matthias Miller</p> When I named my own JavaScript Lint (SourceForge), I should have known I was asking for trouble. So far, Douglas Crockford and I have managed to keep from stepping on each other’s toes by exclusively calling his lint JSLint and calling mine JavaScript Lint or jsl.

It would probably be nice branding to have the Perl packaged called JavaScript::JSLint to advertise the lint’s engine. It would also prevent some of the existing confusion from becoming worse. :-)

Good work, though. That’s pretty slick.

-Matthias Miller

]]>