Comments on: Unit Testing falsehoods http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2007/12/15/unit-testing-falsehoods/ Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:23:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dominic Mitchell http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2007/12/15/unit-testing-falsehoods/#comment-229 Dominic Mitchell Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:00:57 +0000 http://happygiraffe.net/2007/12/15/unit-testing-falsehoods/#comment-229 <p>Thanks, I noticed that it was meant to be much improved in Leopard. I just hadn’t gotten around to playing with it yet.</p> <p>To be honest, I don’t find Objective-C that objectionable. It was just the attitude towards testing that really irked me.</p> Thanks, I noticed that it was meant to be much improved in Leopard. I just hadn’t gotten around to playing with it yet.

To be honest, I don’t find Objective-C that objectionable. It was just the attitude towards testing that really irked me.

]]> By: Mark Fowler http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2007/12/15/unit-testing-falsehoods/#comment-228 Mark Fowler Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:32:17 +0000 http://happygiraffe.net/2007/12/15/unit-testing-falsehoods/#comment-228 <p>I’ve been noodling around with RubyCocoa (which also ships with Leopard…yey!</p> <p>So far, so good. It’s better than Objective-C and the new bindings are <strong>much</strong> better than CamelBones (ObjC/Perl bridge.)</p> <p>Just a thought.</p> I’ve been noodling around with RubyCocoa (which also ships with Leopard…yey!

So far, so good. It’s better than Objective-C and the new bindings are much better than CamelBones (ObjC/Perl bridge.)

Just a thought.

]]>