<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jabbering Giraffe &#187; javawug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://happygiraffe.net/blog/tag/javawug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://happygiraffe.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>The Maven Ecosystem</title>
		<link>http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2009/06/18/the-maven-ecosystem/</link>
		<comments>http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2009/06/18/the-maven-ecosystem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javawug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happygiraffe.net/blog/?p=1541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I went to see Jason van Zyl of sonatype talking about various bits of the maven ecosystem, and where they&#8217;re going. The main bit for me was what&#8217;s coming up in maven 3.0. There was a great deal &#8230; <a href="http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2009/06/18/the-maven-ecosystem/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I went to see <a href="http://twitter.com/jvanzyl">Jason van Zyl</a> of <a href="http://www.sonatype.com/">sonatype</a> talking about various bits of <a href="http://www.jroller.com/javawug/entry/javawug_bof_49_maven_3">the maven ecosystem</a>, and where they&#8217;re going.  The main bit for me was what&#8217;s coming up in maven 3.0.  There was a great deal of talk about <a href="http://www.osgi.org/">OSGI</a> related issues, but it reinforced my belief that whilst there&#8217;s some good technology in there, it&#8217;s still quite complicated to use and manage.  Steps are being taken to address this (better tooling support), but they&#8217;re not there yet.  Also, for the kind of things I do (simple, content-driven, somewhat static webapps), it doesn&#8217;t seem to be necessary anyway.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s coming up in maven 3.0?  Fundamentally, there won&#8217;t be that many new user-visible features (wait for 3.1!).  Internally, there have been <em>huge</em> refactorings by the sound of things (along with integration tests to ensure no user-visible regressions).  They&#8217;re switching away from <a href="http://plexus.codehaus.org/">plexus</a> and towards <a href="http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/">guice</a> + <a href="http://code.google.com/p/peaberry/">peaberry</a>.  But that&#8217;s internal detail.  And in theory, it shouldn&#8217;t matter even if you&#8217;re a plugin author.</p>
<p>What sounded really nice was the focus on making life much easier for users of the embedded maven.  Primarily, this means IDE authors.  Things like plugin &#038; lifecycle extension points, and incremental build support should allow m2eclipse to be much, much more intelligent about the work they do.  Jason mentioned that a version of m2eclipse which builds on the trunk of maven 3.0 can now build the trunk of maven in seconds rather than minutes.  Why?  Because it&#8217;s not duplicating work that&#8217;s already been done by Eclipse.</p>
<p>The main change is to the artifact resolution system.  It&#8217;s been one of the main source of bugs in maven 2.0.  It&#8217;s been completely junked in 3.0 and replaced with <a href="http://maven.apache.org/mercury/index.html">mercury</a>, which handles both transport and resolving artifacts.  It should be better tested, and things like version ranges much closer to how OSGI does things.</p>
<p>One (minor) change is that the error messages should be much better.  That&#8217;s a welcome relief.</p>
<p>There are other tidbits that I <em>think</em> are scheduled for 3.1 that should be really nice:</p>
<ul>
<li>everybody&#8217;s favourite: versionless parent elements</li>
<li>attributes in the POM — hooray, that should make POMs vastly smaller.</li>
<li>mixin POMs — should allow much more flexibility in constructing dependencies on both groups of artifacts and groups of plugins.</li>
</ul>
<p>There were further talks about <a href="https://hudson.dev.java.net/">hudson</a> &#038; <a href="http://nexus.sonatype.org/">nexus</a>, but I&#8217;m fairly familiar with these, so I didn&#8217;t see much of news to me.</p>
<p>My thanks go to <a href="http://www.jroller.com/peter_pilgrim/">Peter Pilgrim</a> for organising and <a href="http://www.conchango.com/">EMC/Comchango</a> for hosting.<a href="http://www.conchango.com/"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://happygiraffe.net/blog/2009/06/18/the-maven-ecosystem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

